.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011

real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. real madrid vs barcelona 2011
  • real madrid vs barcelona 2011



  • gadget1974
    Sep 11, 12:15 PM
    Yeah, that was prior to the invites sent out. Jobs from experience will be pitching the movie store hard..meaning the laptop updates have to take a back seat for now. I mean they announced a 24" iMac quietly just to give you an idea of how important this is to them. Laptop updates? i wouldnt count on it...at least for now

    Agree with you! Also, people tend to forget that Apple split into two divisions - one media and one computers (not the official titles, but that's basically how it works). Anyone who has worked in a large company knows that those two divisions will not cooperate because that's what always happens. Expect only iPod related stuff this week because it's the iPod group's big event. Why would they give the glory away to the other guys? :rolleyes:





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. pau gasol wallpaper,
  • pau gasol wallpaper,



  • CalBoy
    Apr 14, 05:54 PM
    Or just treat all income as ordinary income and eliminate all the preferential treatment certain forms of income enjoy. Eliminate capital gain, business, gift and estate taxes, and treat all income from all sources as ordinary income and tax accordingly.

    I think that could be the easiest way to solve the problem simply, but it would also have to come with a vast elimination of deductions and exemptions.

    And we should, after an across the board cut, IMO.

    There are two big parts of the budget that are hard to cut though. Social Security and Medicare really can't be cut without raising the retirement age to 70 NOW and cutting benefits. I don't think that's going to happen.





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. arcelona vs real madrid 2011
  • arcelona vs real madrid 2011



  • Snowcat001
    May 7, 01:07 PM
    It's free if you think giving Google all of your privacy and identity is worth the 'price' :p

    I'm not giving anything, all names etc. can be fake, no real info is needed.
    The only thing they really know is the IP-adress I most often use to get on the net. :-)





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. Real Madrid vs Barcelona
  • Real Madrid vs Barcelona



  • mikejfrd
    Mar 27, 10:09 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Well my source tells me that whenever the next generation iPhone comes out ATT will have exclusive rights to it for a few months before verizon. How/why I have no idea, I'm just relaying info.





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. Barcelona Vs Real Madrid 2011
  • Barcelona Vs Real Madrid 2011



  • ender land
    Apr 10, 10:54 AM
    For the record, I am sad that 2 is winning (or even close) to 288. But it does help explain one thing - a reason why so many people I try to tutor/help with math cannot seem to understand basic algebra operations is because nearly 50% of people do not understand order of operations (this was roughly the same percentage on the physics poll linked to earlier) :(

    No wonder people have so much trouble with doing algebra correctly :eek:





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. arcelona vs real madrid
  • arcelona vs real madrid



  • dethmaShine
    Apr 18, 03:08 PM
    To be honest, Samsung off of all competitors, deserves that.

    - iPhone design copy? check
    - iPhone UI copy? check
    - Apple keyboard copy? check

    Everything is copied.

    Samsung deserves that and I am sure Samsung will lose this.





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. arcelona vs real madrid
  • arcelona vs real madrid



  • adztaylor
    Apr 18, 03:01 PM
    Waiting for Samsung to counter-sue for some frivolous reason in 3...2...1...

    The merry-go-round continues.





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. real madrid vs barcelona copa
  • real madrid vs barcelona copa



  • McGiord
    Apr 10, 08:12 AM
    gnasher729:
    You were not allowed to vote twice.
    So you voted for?

    :D





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. real madrid vs barcelona live
  • real madrid vs barcelona live



  • Kenn Marks
    Mar 28, 11:54 AM
    Glad to read about Mac.
    No so happy to read about the lack of iPhone hardware till possibly Sept :rolleyes:. I think if their going to wait until September, then we really need to consider the possibility of an LTE iPhone.

    Considering Steve said "2011 was the year of the iPad" he could be right by having it be Apple's Fiscal Year 2011. Then introduce the iPhone 5 and iPad 3 both with LTE and other enhancements in September ready for a Holiday buying frenzy. Of course introducing two blockbuster products would definitely stretch production capabilities and lines 6 blocks long waiting to get ones hands on one.





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. Real Madrid Vs Barcelona 2011
  • Real Madrid Vs Barcelona 2011



  • lilo777
    Mar 30, 02:14 PM
    So let me understand this. You pay to buy your music, you pay to store it 'in the cloud' and you pay data charges (with ever decreasing unlimited data plans) to listen to it.

    This has got to be the stupidest thing I've ever heard of.

    Obviously you do not consider all possibilities. Some people have unlimited data plans (or do not have time to listen to music to often so even the limited plan could suffice). Combined with free 5GB space, people have to pay nothing. Then there are people for whom hundred bucks is not an issue but convenience is. This World (outside Apple ecosystem) is all about choices. And if not enough people will find this service to be attractive, Amazon will close it. Without your telling them.





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. arcelona vs real madrid 2011
  • arcelona vs real madrid 2011



  • LegendKillerUK
    Apr 20, 07:44 AM
    I'm still on a 3G so I'll be loving whatever they do for the 5. I personally don't want them to touch the externals, it's my favourite looking device.





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. Real Madrid vs FC Barcelona
  • Real Madrid vs FC Barcelona



  • ticman
    Nov 20, 09:02 AM
    LOL ok ok so it's WCLYFEE sorry





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. Madrid vs shirt david videos
  • Madrid vs shirt david videos



  • twoodcc
    Aug 3, 07:19 AM
    Wow, measuring battery life by cities. Sounds amazingly scientific. I'm gonna say "You're wrong" just because you cited such a field report. That's disgraceful... :o

    i second that





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. real madrid fc wallpapers
  • real madrid fc wallpapers



  • Cougarcat
    Mar 29, 01:54 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)

    In 5-10 years the iPod will become extinct. By then the touch will be hanging on a thin wire.

    Lemme guess... it'll all be in the cloud, right?

    Nanobots in the bloodstream!





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. Vs real madrid team Un signed
  • Vs real madrid team Un signed



  • kdarling
    Apr 25, 11:28 AM
    iOS uses services from a company called Skyhook to help with location tracking. they use GPS and wifi access points to pinpoint locations faster than GPS.

    Apple stopped using Skyhook a while back, I think around v3.2 or something. Let me check. Yes, that was when Apple changed (http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/29/apple-location/) to using their own WiFi and cell databases.

    Agreed. Google's darling Android doesn't just track cell towers. They've found it recording wi-fi networks near the user as well and transmitting that data... like every couple of minutes.

    See above. Apple does something very similar. Whenever an app requests a location using GPS, the phone also scans for nearby cell towers and WiFi hotspots. That info is sent up to Apple to build their database.

    Why does Google need to know this?

    Same reason as Apple. While on this topic, let's hit the wayback machine:

    Before the iPhone came out, Google was secretly collecting cell location info via any phone with GPS and Google Maps. Mostly Windows Mobile phones, I would think.

    Good thing, too, because the iPhone debuted without GPS and was pretty much useless in that respect. Then Google unveiled a version of Google Maps using their cell location database, and suddenly the iPhone and other phones without GPS reception were useful after all.

    Yet I use Google every day, but I at least know they're watching me.

    Yet you didn't know Apple was. Ignorance is bliss.

    Except that neither cares about watching YOU. They're watching for cells and hotspots. Sorry, they're more important :)

    Ok, here's the information that's actually known about the consolidated.db file:
    1) It records the locations of nearby wi-fi access points and cell towers.
    2) When location services were originally added to the iPhone, the file had a different name and was stored in a different location. (It was moved as part of the multi-tasking updates.)
    3) The purpose of the file has been explicitly spelled out by Apple *from the beginning*. It is used *by* location services to calculate your current position in order to be able to display your position faster than would be possible solely using GPS. (It's part of the Assisted GPS process.)
    4) There is absolutely no evidence that the file's contents are ever transmitted to anyone. It exists on the iPhone, and in the backup(s) of said iPhone.

    That's almost all correct (*). It's just a receive-only cache to speed up locating and use less battery and network resources.

    (*) WiFi and cell are not part of A-GPS. The A in A-GPS on the iPhone is about receiving satellite information from an assistance server on the 'net.





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. wallpaper Puyol arcelona,
  • wallpaper Puyol arcelona,



  • SiliconAddict
    Nov 22, 11:16 PM
    Palm makes nothing but garbage.

    The management of the company, in fact, was so pathetic that they ended up selling out to big MS and making PPC-based phones like everyone else. Ever since that day, I have no interest for any of the garbage they make - and I was lusting after their stupid overpriced and ugly PDA phones before they made that decision.

    They sold out to MS because the idiots at Palm couldn't find their butt with a flashlight and both hands. Seriously in 2001 the CEO of Palm stood infront of a crowd at CES and stated our users don't want color, sound etc. It was the beginning of the end because by the time they figured out that yes. Not only do users want color and sound they also want the ability to multitask. Something that POS (Notice that Palm OS and Peice of **** share the same acronym.) STILL to this day doesn't really do. Well it sort of does it in a craptacular manner. My point is Palm doomed them selves because they had management who didn't have a clue or simply didn't have the resources to really revamp the OS from the ground up. I'm willing to bet there is legacy code in POS that dates back to v1. Because POS never had its OS X its Windows 2000. It never had its rewrite. All Palm has been doing is slapping on a new addition to the house and calling it NEW and improved!
    It isn't. It sucks and the Pocket PC or Windows Mobile (ick I hate that name.) kicks the living snot out of POS right now in pretty much every way imaginable. Heck Palm is so lost that they are trying to pull an Apple. they purchased some *nix company in China that has experience with mobile versions of *nix and right now is trying to migrate POS over to a *nix flavor of OS.
    Unfortunately unlike Apple its too little, too late.
    Palm went to Windows because they didn't want to stay stuck in the mobile equivalent of DOS.





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. vs Real Madrid en direct en
  • vs Real Madrid en direct en



  • steviem
    Nov 4, 04:55 PM
    Sophos is terrible on Windows; why would anyone want to install that garbage on their Mac? :confused:

    LOL, whatever you say chief!





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. Would take real madrid,
  • Would take real madrid,



  • moet_01
    Aug 12, 05:33 PM
    I don't understand.

    I think the update will come before Septemver 16th. If I order before the 16th I can take advantage of the free iPod. I don't care if this means order, ship in x weeks.


    The updated Books will not be a qualifying Mac for the Free iPod.





    real madrid vs barcelona wallpaper 2011. See latest photos wallpapers
  • See latest photos wallpapers



  • kenypowa
    Apr 26, 04:45 PM
    LOL @ all the sour apples. Fanboys in collective denial.;)

    Actually iPhone is doing great. Other than Apple and Google, everyone is losing.





    milo
    Sep 11, 11:05 AM
    As for the movie store...I think I remember SJ in an interview awhile back saying, while he likes the purchase model for music, movies lend themselves to the subscription model because most people only watch a movie once or twice, Star Wars geeks notwithstanding. So I think the movie store is going to be like a true movie store. If you want to buy a movie you can, but the emphasis will be more on a NetFlix type model. A $15/mo sub gets you 3 movies at a time, unlimited d/ls per mo. Alternatively, you could rent a single movie for $4, viewable for a week or so. For people who don't have time to convert a DVD to an iPod viewable format that makes sense. Buying for $15 or $10 isn't going to excite anyone I don't think.

    I doubt a download service would be able to offer unlimited movie downloads, at least not for a price next to netflix. Netflix "unlimited" movies really aren't because they are limited by the speed of the post office (and artificially limited even more by Netflix if you watch too many).





    Jape
    Nov 3, 04:30 PM
    what a rip off, tomtom is a joke. sub par navigation app $99 and another $119 for their stupid car mount that does nothing but improve gps signal. they are r@ping many people.

    well i do agree with you that it is to expensive, but it does a little more than improve the gps. It also works as a hands free calling device with a speaker, charges your iphone, works with other gps apps, and plays your music through your car stereo.





    peeInMyPantz
    Jul 30, 10:37 PM
    5 megapixel seems unrealistic for a cellphone camera right now, but it would sure be nice, I have a 1.3 megapixel camera on my phone, just because it's 1.3 megapixels doesn't mean it's good quality, how do we know that the 5 megapixel camera will be any better? could be as grainy or worse as a low end VGA/megapixel camera :( but knowing Apple, some people will pay a shiny red cent for high quality camera anyways (esp Apple fans)

    I disagree for inability to do texting, say if you are in a different country, where it costs say $3/minute just to call someone, or 50c just to send a text message (receiving is usually free), big difference if you just want to send a message of "I'm at the door" or "I'm leaving right now", I'm currently paying for long distance since I'm in a part of Canada that is not my home region, any time someone not from the area I'm in calls ME, I pay for it, and any time I call someone from home, I pay for it as well, so text messaging has really cut down on bills, I don't go over my minutes as much anymore with texting, since 90% of my calls were 1 minute or less calls, so thats where text messaging comes in handy. Although I would rather use a blackberry-like device with free email (if there was such thing, or have an email-only plan that doesnt require a data plan, like text messages)

    y not? there are already 6 mega pixels camera phones





    vincebio
    Nov 22, 12:29 PM
    Mr Palm, Apple fan boys:

    The perfect smart phone has already been created and is out in the wild: SONY ERICSSON P990.

    Wifi, location free, 2 mp camera with flash, keyboard, MP3 player, videos, etc.


    yeah. except they forgot to put RAM in it...and the firmware is crap so far..and the battery last about...erm, 24 hours..and they wont support mac..ever!

    great phone though!:)





    emotion
    Aug 11, 10:06 AM
    That said, I don't see the MacBooks going with the Core 2 Duo until sometime next year. The Core Duo is a fine chip, and will handle pretty much anything a MacBook owner would need, and it would make the more expensive MacBook Pro seem more appealing.

    I'm not sure Intel will be selling yonahs at that point. It's not really up to apple anymore more to do with the economics of dealing with Intel. Which is actually a good thing, things move quicker that way.